Audience Research
Join discussions about museum evaluation and audience research.
Our Bloggers
Lynda Kelly
Manager Online, Editing and Audience Research
Chris Lang
Audience Researcher/Advocate
Michael Hugill
Online Producer @michaelhugill
Irene Rubino
Intern
Archives
-
Audience Research
- Dec 2011
- Nov 2011
- Oct 2011
-
Aug 2011
- Notes From the Future: A Reflection on My Internship
- Science in the City: Sparking Interest
- Digital Literacies ... and app development
- Evaluation Twitter feeds to follow
- My Critical Appraisal of Surviving Australia
- Weapons! To battle ... or not to battle?
- Natural history specimens as social media stars: Mr Blobby
- Birds of Paradise Exhibition: Title Testing Results
- Do museum shops need to know about Web 2.0 and social media?
- Kids Teaching Kids - Solutions in the Works
- Ask a curator...1 September 2010
- Value Packaging for Families
- Smithsonian Commons Prototype
- Kids and credibility in the online world
- Twitter as an audience research tool?
- USA Trip 2010: Impressions from a land far far away
- The dinner table
- How do Australian Museum visitors use social media?
- Smartphones and open content – emerging trends
- Are we addicted to social media?
- Visitors to the Australian Museum use social media
- Sep 2011
- Jul 2011
- Jun 2011
- May 2011
- Apr 2011
- Mar 2011
- Feb 2011
- Jan 2011
- Dec 2010
- Oct 2010
-
Sep 2010
- An introduction to Twitter
- Digital Heritage Students Lecture
- The Science of Climate Change: Questions and Answers
- Science in the City - The Final Lap!
- Science in the City - the Marathon Begins!
- Science in the City - A Marathon of Heroes
- How to be clever on Facebook
- Museums and the Web Conference 2010
- Museums and Web 2.0
- Web 2.0 for small and volunteer museums
- Aug 2010
- Jul 2010
- Jun 2010
- May 2010
- Mar 2010
- Feb 2010
- Jan 2010
- Dec 2009
- Nov 2009
-
Oct 2009
- Innovation in the Art Museum Symposium Taipei Day 2
- Innovation in the Art Museum Symposium Taipei Day 1
- What is the Audience Research Blog?
- Taipei Travels October 2009
- Handheld technology in museums
- Museums on Twitter
- Papers on museums and Web 2.0
- Knowledge Workers
- Crowdsourcing and exhibition development
- Applying and sharing research findings
- Summative Evaluation: Dinosaur Unearthed Exhibition
- Interest in Ancient Cultures
- Climate Change and Museums
- Sep 2009
- Aug 2009
- Jul 2009
- May 2009
Measuring “success” in the on-line environment
How do you measure visitors' online engagement beyond mere numbers?
In our Museums and the Web paper we look at different ways on-line users have been classified, and report on studies at the Australian Museum that have attempted to unpack these findings further. Seb Chan's paper, Towards New Metrics of Success For On-Line Museum Projects, argues for a more holistic way to look at on-line visitation, using new tools and broadening the segmentations first proposed by Peacock and Bronwbill.
My Museum colleague, Russ Weakley, set out some ideas about ways to measure visitor engagement with our new website which seem to be quite useful on a broader scale. Here's some text from an email he sent about this issue:
We need to look at methods that measure quality rather than quantity. We may have 2 million visits a year (for now), but how many were satisfied? How many got what they wanted. How many engaged? ... More importantly, we will soon be focussing much more on HOW people are using the site and if we have made any financial gains, not how many people visit. This means looking at things like:
- how many comments?
- how many tags?
- how many discussions between users?
- how many questions have users answered for themselves?
- how many images have users uploaded?
- how many members do we have?
- how active are these members (do they join and never return)?
- how many people are being converted from free to paid membership!!!
- how many products have been sold?
- how many event pages have been visited due to site-wide advertising?
- how many real donations have been made via the website and why?
Russ also pointed out that we need to go beyond comparing ourselves to other museums and galleries to looking at how we compare to sites like Wikipedia, MySpace, Facebook, Flickr, YouTube, etc. More importantly, is how we compare to other sites that are producing similar nature focussed content (for our Museum) within the commercial and private sector.
Since these discussions Russ has sent on a link to a blog post - What’s Wrong With Social Media Marketing Strategy - that makes some pertinent points.
So, much food for thought and we'll be looking at these issues in more detail over the next few months as we bed in our new site.
Dr
Lynda Kelly
, Manager Online, Editing and Audience Research
Last Updated: