Audience Research
Join discussions about museum evaluation and audience research.
Our Bloggers
Chris Lang
Audience Researcher/Advocate
Archives
-
Audience Research
- Dec 2011
- Nov 2011
- Oct 2011
-
Aug 2011
- Notes From the Future: A Reflection on My Internship
- Science in the City: Sparking Interest
- Digital Literacies ... and app development
- Evaluation Twitter feeds to follow
- My Critical Appraisal of Surviving Australia
- Weapons! To battle ... or not to battle?
- Natural history specimens as social media stars: Mr Blobby
- Birds of Paradise Exhibition: Title Testing Results
- Do museum shops need to know about Web 2.0 and social media?
- Kids Teaching Kids - Solutions in the Works
- Ask a curator...1 September 2010
- Value Packaging for Families
- Smithsonian Commons Prototype
- Kids and credibility in the online world
- Twitter as an audience research tool?
- USA Trip 2010: Impressions from a land far far away
- The dinner table
- How do Australian Museum visitors use social media?
- Smartphones and open content – emerging trends
- Are we addicted to social media?
- Visitors to the Australian Museum use social media
- Sep 2011
- Jul 2011
- Jun 2011
- May 2011
- Apr 2011
- Mar 2011
- Feb 2011
- Jan 2011
- Dec 2010
- Oct 2010
-
Sep 2010
- An introduction to Twitter
- Digital Heritage Students Lecture
- The Science of Climate Change: Questions and Answers
- Science in the City - The Final Lap!
- Science in the City - the Marathon Begins!
- Science in the City - A Marathon of Heroes
- How to be clever on Facebook
- Museums and the Web Conference 2010
- Museums and Web 2.0
- Web 2.0 for small and volunteer museums
- Aug 2010
- Jul 2010
- Jun 2010
- May 2010
- Mar 2010
- Feb 2010
- Jan 2010
- Dec 2009
- Nov 2009
-
Oct 2009
- Innovation in the Art Museum Symposium Taipei Day 2
- Innovation in the Art Museum Symposium Taipei Day 1
- What is the Audience Research Blog?
- Taipei Travels October 2009
- Handheld technology in museums
- Museums on Twitter
- Papers on museums and Web 2.0
- Knowledge Workers
- Crowdsourcing and exhibition development
- Applying and sharing research findings
- Summative Evaluation: Dinosaur Unearthed Exhibition
- Interest in Ancient Cultures
- Climate Change and Museums
- Sep 2009
- Aug 2009
- Jul 2009
- May 2009
What’s in a Name? Evaluation of exhibition titles
Tips on how to evaluate potential titles/names for exhibitions. Elements of this article first appeared in 'Visitor Behaviour', Fall/Winter, 1997, Numbers 3-4, Page 32
Clever or catchy? Informative or insane! Brash or boring? Titles must one of the least loved yet important aspects of developing exhibitions in museums. Titles need to capture the ‘essence’ of the exhibition subject area yet still be catchy enough to sell to a public that is constantly exposed to clever and, often inane, advertising and selling. Evaluators may be called in to help resolve arguments about this touchy subject but how is this best done?
At the Australian Museum we have conducted many evaluations for exhibition titles. We usually try to find out more information from visitors about why they like or dislike a suggested name which always gives interesting insights into what they think about the topic overall, as well as the Museum generally.
We often think that visitors haven’t heard of a concept or term, such as ‘biodiversity’ or ‘Indigenous Australians’, and are always surprised at the knowledge that our visitors bring to the Museum.
We often go to our visitors with ‘sexy’ or ‘cool’ titles that they hate, or conservative titles which they like. Either way it seems we can’t win!
So what to do? We have found that there are a number of issues or things to be aware of when choosing or testing titles:
- There is a need to ensure that a sufficient variety of names are tested that allow some conclusions to be made about many different types of titles rather than just variations on a theme.
- Visitors usually dislike titles that are trying to be ‘too clever’, but they want titles that are catchy and interesting, particularly younger visitors.
- They don’t want titles that are misleading or could be misinterpreted.
- There is a mixed view about titles being either too long or too short - some like them long with a sub-title, and some short.
- Visitors usually want titles that will tell them what the exhibition is about and what they’ll see there.
- They like titles that imply active experiences, fun and discovery (as long as this is followed through in the exhibition of course!).
- There is usually one title that they dislike the most - often the one that the museum likes the most!
- Make sure staff at reception/front-of-house are comfortable saying the name aloud as they'll often be the ones selling the exhibition to visitors.
Don't stress too much and remember, less is more in most cases and strap-lines often redundant quickly become redundant!
Dr
Lynda Kelly
, Manager Online, Editing and Audience Research
Last Updated: 13 May 2011
Would you like to add a comment?
Sign up to add comments and find out more about the other benefits you can enjoy.
Would you like to add a tag?
Sign up to add tags and find out more about the other benefits you can enjoy.
1 comment
Lynda Kelly
8.02 AM, 09 February 2011
Problem solved - MIT's Random Exhibition Title generator! (via AAM Media and Technology on Facebook)
Report misuse