Audience Research
Join discussions about museum evaluation and audience research.
Our Bloggers
Chris Lang
Audience Researcher/Advocate
Archives
-
Audience Research
- Dec 2011
- Nov 2011
- Oct 2011
-
Aug 2011
- Notes From the Future: A Reflection on My Internship
- Science in the City: Sparking Interest
- Digital Literacies ... and app development
- Evaluation Twitter feeds to follow
- My Critical Appraisal of Surviving Australia
- Weapons! To battle ... or not to battle?
- Natural history specimens as social media stars: Mr Blobby
- Birds of Paradise Exhibition: Title Testing Results
- Do museum shops need to know about Web 2.0 and social media?
- Kids Teaching Kids - Solutions in the Works
- Ask a curator...1 September 2010
- Value Packaging for Families
- Smithsonian Commons Prototype
- Kids and credibility in the online world
- Twitter as an audience research tool?
- USA Trip 2010: Impressions from a land far far away
- The dinner table
- How do Australian Museum visitors use social media?
- Smartphones and open content – emerging trends
- Are we addicted to social media?
- Visitors to the Australian Museum use social media
- Sep 2011
- Jul 2011
- Jun 2011
- May 2011
- Apr 2011
- Mar 2011
- Feb 2011
- Jan 2011
- Dec 2010
- Oct 2010
-
Sep 2010
- An introduction to Twitter
- Digital Heritage Students Lecture
- The Science of Climate Change: Questions and Answers
- Science in the City - The Final Lap!
- Science in the City - the Marathon Begins!
- Science in the City - A Marathon of Heroes
- How to be clever on Facebook
- Museums and the Web Conference 2010
- Museums and Web 2.0
- Web 2.0 for small and volunteer museums
- Aug 2010
- Jul 2010
- Jun 2010
- May 2010
- Mar 2010
- Feb 2010
- Jan 2010
- Dec 2009
- Nov 2009
-
Oct 2009
- Innovation in the Art Museum Symposium Taipei Day 2
- Innovation in the Art Museum Symposium Taipei Day 1
- What is the Audience Research Blog?
- Taipei Travels October 2009
- Handheld technology in museums
- Museums on Twitter
- Papers on museums and Web 2.0
- Knowledge Workers
- Crowdsourcing and exhibition development
- Applying and sharing research findings
- Summative Evaluation: Dinosaur Unearthed Exhibition
- Interest in Ancient Cultures
- Climate Change and Museums
- Sep 2009
- Aug 2009
- Jul 2009
- May 2009
Skeletons Exhibition Evaluation
As part of the review of the Museum Renewal Project an evaluation was undertaken into how visitors were responding to the Skeletons exhibition. This study aimed to understand the background to the exhibit, what was originally intended to be its aims and messages, how this exhibit is viewed now by visitors and how well it meets the Museum’s current criteria.
So what did we find?
Skeletons was the most popular permanent exhibition for visitors. It was described as being educational, unique, different, atmospheric and welcoming. The exhibition has a strong connection with visitors 79% considered that it would matter to them personally if there were no Skeletons exhibition. When asked for what improvements could be made 28% of respondents could not think of any way to improve the exhibition, and a further 13% were very definite in liking it just the way it is. As one respondent said:
Its perfect, why change it?
From observation and visitor comments the exhibition seems to fit with the preconceived idea of “What a Museum should be like”. The gallery is something “Museums should have” and in a world of rapid unsettling change is a constant that generations of visitors (from Australia) can share with their descendents and re-experience the wonder they felt seeing it for the first time. Children in particular described the space as “Cool” and received a thrill in seeing a human or animal skeleton for the first time (in the flesh, please forgive the pun!).
The exhibition was described as “educational”, with visitors receiving a variety of messages, however 19% received no message at all. The most popular responses were vague comments about “bone structure”, “the importance of bones” and “evolution”. The communication of the educational messages has been disrupted by the reorientation of the entrance away from the café end, with visitors now entering halfway through the sequence of displays. This did not seem to have had much impact, however, on the enjoyment of the exhibition.
The most popular displays were the Bicycle interactive and Home Sweet Home, with 30% of visitors being drawn to these displays as soon as they entered. Most visitors moved in a clockwise direction engaging with most displays. The least engaging displays were the video and Lord Howe Island diorama.
The evaluation found that the exhibition provided good opportunities for interaction between parents and young children.
Dr
Lynda Kelly
, Manager Online, Editing and Audience Research
Last Updated: 16 September 2009
Would you like to add a comment?
Sign up to add comments and find out more about the other benefits you can enjoy.
Would you like to add a tag?
Sign up to add tags and find out more about the other benefits you can enjoy.